LogFAQs > #881544793

I'm going to try my best to spin this as an exercise. From the WaPo article we learn:
-Trump maintains rent subsidized apartments for housing low income tenants, which he doesn't have to do.
-except for the end of the article where they say they don't actually know how much stake he still has in these locations
-any stake he may have was placed into a trust when he became president, meaning he isn't seeing the money directly
-The subsidies from the govt make up for the lack of rent being charged, balancing out the total rent that would otherwise be charged (tenants pay 30%, the govt covers the rest) therefore not increasing the amount of money one would make from renting those apartments
-nevertheless the WaPo article claims those subsidies as profits and not subsidies
-the money subsidized from this program represents about 1% of Trump's housing profits, anyway, meaning the impact is almost negligible even if it were profit.
---

"History Is Much Like An Endless Waltz. The Three Beats Of War, Peace And Revolution Continue On Forever." - Gundam Wing: Endless Waltz