LogFAQs > #882086959

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, Database 1 ( 03.09.2017-09.16.2017 ), DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	lol @ ppl defending Crash Trilogy's 30fps cause it's the ''original experience''
faizan_faizan 06/30/17 10:59:14 AM #11:	Link HT posted... faizan_faizan posted... You can't defend the statement, neither disagree with it because the consoles' CPUs are the limiting factor. The engine is clearly based around its processing capabilities so it would require a major downgrade in AI and whatnot to run it at double the speed. In other words, wait for next gen. ignoring the bunch of nonsense that's being said in the top paragraph Great counter. Romulox28 posted... faizan_faizan posted... You can't defend the statement, neither disagree with it because the consoles' CPUs are the limiting factor. The engine is clearly based around its processing capabilities so it would require a major downgrade in AI and whatnot to run it at double the speed. In other words, wait for next gen. fps will never be a priority for devs because it requires a lot of effort to achieve, maybe a graphical downgrade, and for most games it's not something sexy you can market like "4k." gears of war 4 has its multiplayer running at a consistent 60fps, and it honestly makes a huge difference when you go from the 30fps horde/campaign the 60fps competitive multiplayer. only people that dont care about the frame rate are the ones who honestly don't know any better I meant for this game. I don't know how many games will be 60fps next gen, or if the CPU upgrade will affect the percentage of 60fps games at all. --- Allergic to bull**. <cite>faizan_faizan posted [p:882086959] in lol @ ppl ... [t:75516874]...</cite> <quote><cite>Link HT posted...</cite> <quote><cite>faizan_faizan posted...</cite> <quote>You can't defend the statement, neither disagree with it because the consoles' CPUs are the limiting factor. The engine is clearly based around its processing capabilities so it would require a major downgrade in AI and whatnot to run it at double the speed. In other words, wait for next gen.</quote> ignoring the bunch of nonsense that's being said in the top paragraph</quote> Great counter. <cite>Romulox28 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>faizan_faizan posted...</cite> <quote>You can't defend the statement, neither disagree with it because the consoles' CPUs are the limiting factor. The engine is clearly based around its processing capabilities so it would require a major downgrade in AI and whatnot to run it at double the speed. In other words, wait for next gen.</quote> fps will never be a priority for devs because it requires a lot of effort to achieve, maybe a graphical downgrade, and for most games it's not something sexy you can market like "4k." gears of war 4 has its multiplayer running at a consistent 60fps, and it honestly makes a huge difference when you go from the 30fps horde/campaign the 60fps competitive multiplayer. only people that dont care about the frame rate are the ones who honestly don't know any better</quote> I meant for this game. I don't know how many games will be 60fps next gen, or if the CPU upgrade will affect the percentage of 60fps games at all. --- Allergic to bull**.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1