LogFAQs > #882762791

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, Database 1 ( 03.09.2017-09.16.2017 ), DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear
Topic List
Page List: 1
TopicDo you think it should be illegal to intentionally name Bills(law) misleadingly?
Zeus
07/12/17 2:36:43 AM
#3:


Few things:

First off, how the fuck would you enforce that? It's an impossibly vague standard.

Second, just because the bill doesn't mean what you think it means doesn't automatically mean it's misleading. "Restoring Internet Freedom" is certainly one example, because net neutrality is a regulation and therefore impedes freedom.

Third, even bills which do the opposite have a kernel of truth to them. The ACA, for instance, had the side-effect of making healthcare unaffordable for countless Americans and in other cases it simply gave the thing away for free rather than controlling prices, but it did lower costs for a small number of people due to caps.

And finally bills need real names so the public has an idea of what's being discussed.
---
(\/)(\/)|-|
In Zeus We Trust: All Others Pay Cash
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1