LogFAQs > #884261604

AmericaTheBrave posted...

I4NRulez posted...

If you isolate pieces of his life yes, he did preach some hateful things but his life as a whole shows the beginnings of where he came and the man he ended up becoming.

Plus Malcolm X's hate was a reaction to the proactive hate his people received from white people. If Malcolm X lived today and had all those views, he'd be just a regular racist jerk. But he lived in pre-60's America where blacks were second-class citizens and seen as subhuman by the whole government and every-day white people acted accordingly. He had family members who were murdered by whites who got away with it. You try feeling rosy about your oppressors living under that.

So because some of his family members were killed, somehow his beliefs about all white people being white devils and failed experiments is justified? It might be understandable for him to hate the white people who did that, but how does that change that Richard Spencer preaches the same type of racial supremacy?

If Richard Spencer had family members who were killed by black people, would that justify or in some way explain away Richard Spencer's evil views? Would that warrant people upholding him as some beacon of freedom and truth and nobility?
---

Humans are aliens too dumbass - clearaflagrantj