A lone wolf would be considered anyone who separately commits an act of violence without anyone telling them to go out and do something violent.
If several white nationalists decided to storm and shoot up the church, then it would not be considered a lone wolf incident.
Since you can't answer the question, I'm going to assume that's a yes. It's seems you're defending these white supremacist. So if Roof and Fields are "lone wolves" of the supremacists, can you tell me what the real message the other wolves was trying to deliver?
I'm not defending anyone. I defend the first amendment. Everyone has a right to organize and voice their opinions in this country.
I don't know what every group's specific "message" is, so I can't answer that question.
Yes, they do have that freedom. As do counterprotesters and anyone that wants to negatively judge them and treat them like pariahs.
By the way, the problem yesterday was that it was more then peaceful organization. There were armed militias, pepper spray, beatings, harassment, and a terror attack resulting in a murder. ---
