LogFAQs > #885610418

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, Database 1 ( 03.09.2017-09.16.2017 ), DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Jim Sterling takes Player Unknown to the Battlegrounds and destroys him
ZombiePelican 08/28/17 5:14:03 PM #131:	Jeff AKA Snoopy posted... Did you think they were going to try to "be better" than everyone else? Considering they were something of anomaly of the early access scene, yeah I was Jeff AKA Snoopy posted... They have, IMO, provided the best game of this style that exists today Well your opinion is that of a sniveling and spineless apologist, so it's a good thing it's irrelevant and a joke that nobody should take seriously Jeff AKA Snoopy posted... I would never indulge in anyways because I'm not a sucker, so be it. You're a sucker for defending microtransactions that only benefit Bluehole themselves Jeff AKA Snoopy posted... 1. This is not a full price game. You keep calling it that, when full price games are nearly double the price of this. Stop acting like you've paid 60 dollars for this game and you are entitled to what you THINK that symbolizes. Hell, the new Shadow of Mordor game has loot boxes and micro-transactions in the SINGLE PLAYER mode. Your perception of what you are entitled to means nothing. It doesn't matter if it's not full price, you still paid up front for the game microtransactions belong nowhere near any game you paid for, and there is NO defending this. Also you're defending Shadow of War's microtransactions when they're not even cosmetic and actually affect the gameplay. You're just looking fo a company's cock to attach your mouth too Jeff AKA Snoopy posted... 2. When you purchased this game (assuming you did), they have since delivered on the promises they put forth in their developers guide. This game is in no way fundamentally different than what was promised, at all. Arguably it is better for adding cosmetic options that many users seem to be perfectly fine with. You do not have to indulge in any of it, and it is still the game you were promised and you paid for, without any extra fee's. Sorry they're just cosmetic, is not and never will be a justification for microtransactions in a a game you paid for. Sorry Jeff AKA Snoopy posted... none of your arguments really have any validity at all. Irony coming from the guy who uses the same debunked fallacies over and over to justify anticonsumersim and greed Jeff AKA Snoopy posted... Am I a smart consumer who does not need to be protected from this "scourge"? Yes. You are not a smart consumer, you're a loyal corporate shill Also learn to use the fucking quote feature --- http://i.imgur.com/J1Fi0Cw.jpg http://i.imgur.com/MCC79Ov.jpg http://i.imgur.com/iEMaJl1.jpg http://i.imgur.com/grqvrr9.png <cite>ZombiePelican posted [p:885610418] in Jim Sterli... [t:75716504]...</cite> <quote><cite>Jeff AKA Snoopy posted...</cite> <quote>Did you think they were going to try to "be better" than everyone else? </quote> Considering they were something of anomaly of the early access scene, yeah I was <cite>Jeff AKA Snoopy posted...</cite> <quote>They have, IMO, provided the best game of this style that exists today</quote> Well your opinion is that of a sniveling and spineless apologist, so it's a good thing it's irrelevant and a joke that nobody should take seriously <cite>Jeff AKA Snoopy posted...</cite> <quote>I would never indulge in anyways because I'm not a sucker, so be it. </quote> You're a sucker for defending microtransactions that only benefit Bluehole themselves <cite>Jeff AKA Snoopy posted...</cite> <quote> 1. This is not a full price game. You keep calling it that, when full price games are nearly double the price of this. Stop acting like you've paid 60 dollars for this game and you are entitled to what you THINK that symbolizes. Hell, the new Shadow of Mordor game has loot boxes and micro-transactions in the SINGLE PLAYER mode. Your perception of what you are entitled to means nothing. </quote> It doesn't matter if it's not full price, you still paid up front for the game microtransactions belong nowhere near any game you paid for, and there is NO defending this. Also you're defending Shadow of War's microtransactions when they're not even cosmetic and actually affect the gameplay. You're just looking fo a company's cock to attach your mouth too <cite>Jeff AKA Snoopy posted...</cite> <quote>2. When you purchased this game (assuming you did), they have since delivered on the promises they put forth in their developers guide. This game is in no way fundamentally different than what was promised, at all. Arguably it is better for adding cosmetic options that many users seem to be perfectly fine with. You do not have to indulge in any of it, and it is still the game you were promised and you paid for, without any extra fee's.</quote> Sorry they're just cosmetic, is not and never will be a justification for microtransactions in a a game you paid for. Sorry <cite>Jeff AKA Snoopy posted...</cite> <quote>none of your arguments really have any validity at all. </quote> Irony coming from the guy who uses the same debunked fallacies over and over to justify anticonsumersim and greed <cite>Jeff AKA Snoopy posted...</cite> <quote>Am I a smart consumer who does not need to be protected from this "scourge"? Yes.</quote> You are not a smart consumer, you're a loyal corporate shill Also learn to use the fucking quote feature --- http://i.imgur.com/J1Fi0Cw.jpg http://i.imgur.com/MCC79Ov.jpg http://i.imgur.com/iEMaJl1.jpg http://i.imgur.com/grqvrr9.png</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1