LogFAQs > #886200165

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, Database 1 ( 03.09.2017-09.16.2017 ), DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Texas first responders sue chemical company whose plant exploded during Harvey
Duncanwii 09/07/17 4:31:32 PM #12:	Anarchy_Juiblex posted... Duncanwii posted... I think that yeah, there should be regulations in place to prevent that from happening. I don't disagree. We need new regulations to deal with that. (Unless they already exist and weren't followed, like I said, I'd rather hear the fucking case before casting judgement.) Can't punish people for not having followed new regulations before they existed. Of course not. Ex Facto laws are illegal. But that still doesn't excuse there not being no regulations in the first place. What if that plant had been nuclear and that had exploded? It would have taken out ton of a lot more people. --- This is my year of Pokemon! Pokemon games I'm playing: Black, Fire Red. <cite>Duncanwii posted [p:886200165] in Texas firs... [t:75751470]...</cite> <quote><cite>Anarchy_Juiblex posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Duncanwii posted...</cite> <quote>I think that yeah, there should be regulations in place to prevent that from happening.</quote> I don't disagree. We need new regulations to deal with that. (Unless they already exist and weren't followed, like I said, I'd rather hear the fucking case before casting judgement.) Can't punish people for not having followed new regulations before they existed.</quote> Of course not. Ex Facto laws are illegal. But that still doesn't excuse there not being no regulations in the first place. What if that plant had been nuclear and that had exploded? It would have taken out ton of a lot more people. --- This is my year of Pokemon! Pokemon games I'm playing: Black, Fire Red.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1