LogFAQs > #962777253

Kyuubi4269 posted...

Anybody unwilling to debate science doesn't get what science is for.

Any scientist worth their salt can and will back up their claims with observations, show how it was controlled for and explain how they assert their margin of error. Part of what makes science great is that you can and should have back and forths to air potential vulnerabilities and show how they either don't apply or don't matter.

Give me a break dude. We're talking about science deniers here and you're acting like they have something to add to science. No, they're all useless bad faith actors and their only goal in debating is to cast doubt on the science that they perceive as conflicting with their own worldview. The only value in debating them is to allow them to demonstrate how insane they are. The back and forth you're talking about should be between scientists or science communicators and the general public. Science deniers can go bury their heads in the sand.