LogFAQs > #963695913

Unbridled9 posted...

Barring situations where there's legitimate health concerns, I don't see it as medical care.

Then you don't know anything about medical care and you should know better than to chime in on this subject.

It seems to me that post is just highlighting negative aspects of pregnancy and then using that as justification for a procedure simply because there are negative aspects.

Yes. Like all health care. Because this is a matter of health care and medical bodily autonomy that our laws literally give more respect to corpses to than living pregnant people.

Edit: Also, let's be honest here. No one here's going to be moved from their position. I don't believe abortion should be permitted except in instances where there are serious medical issues (such as situations where a mothers life is at risk) as I value the unborn

Lol, no you don't. You aren't affording "the unborn" any rights other than ones that give them superseding rights over the people carrying them to term, which is not how rights work. The State does not force living people to give their blood and spare organs to sustain the lives of others (and those come with fewer side-effects and risks). The State does not even force corpses to give their bodies to sustain the life of others (no side-effects and risks). You want to make a blatantly bigoted exception in the law.