LogFAQs > #963777143

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, Database 10 ( 02.17.2022-12-01-2022 ), DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Elden Ring Mafia Topic 8
Panthera 03/26/22 6:13:35 PM #22:	DoomTheGyarados posted... Well isnt that an unfortunate coincidence if that turns out to be true. I suppose it is true a scum Chris could decide, after one of his members of scum is shot dead, to claim power just for the fun when you were probably already on your way. Of course the truth is that I was just being transparent with my night action. No, like I said I assume you guessed something was up since it wasn't hard entirely subtle. Easy to spin it off as testing my reaction since it came after I promise to have effort today. Not like that gambit has never been seen before. DoomTheGyarados posted... You read what I wrote with Isquen and think to yourself he defended Isquen day 1, let me attack this but if you go back and read how I defended him precisely you would understand the tact I discussed with Crescent was one of prudence not me claiming to actually have any genuine concrete read. Issue being that you defended the idea of defending Isquen with the prudence line, but your defense of him directly brought up the personal read side too much for that to be entirely true. You covered for and appealed to him personally a bit too much for it to have been purely about disdain for day 1 newbie lynches (especially since it continued to a fair extent into today) DoomTheGyarados posted... For example, the Scare lynch was indeed town but you didnt offer any defense of him at the time. Wasn't here to do it. Like I know damn well you know better than to think this is meaningful, because while it's true that I could go silent on purpose as scum (I've never skipped a whole deadline as scum but I've peaced out at -15 minutes when town went full stupid) it's also true that I can just not be around and you have no way of knowing which is which to base an argument on. DoomTheGyarados posted... For one, there is nothing wrong with having people you were or are somewhat suspicious of voting with you to try to lynch people. You keep acting as if this is some weird thing but getting reactions out of people is pretty common Id say. It's not damning but it is a bit weird to be on board with voting alongside people you think are scum. You can have your opinion change based on how they respond to you sure but the way you went through it and explained it does not add up. Again, I'm not saying you totally derped the game with huge glaring errors, I know you don't make those much if ever. Only that there's too many smaller issues for me to not see through you. DoomTheGyarados posted... As for why I voted for you Marth moe or less asked, so I decided to. Sometimes I am just nice like that. Not everything has to be a huge conspiracy, sometimes I am very earnest. Not everything has to be but everything could be. --- Meow! <cite>Panthera posted [p:963777143] in Elden Ring... [t:79959973]...</cite> <quote><cite>DoomTheGyarados posted... </cite> <quote> Well isnt that an unfortunate coincidence if that turns out to be true. I suppose it is true a scum Chris could decide, after one of his members of scum is shot dead, to claim power just for the fun when you were probably already on your way. Of course the truth is that I was just being transparent with my night action.</quote> No, like I said I assume you guessed something was up since it wasn't hard entirely subtle. Easy to spin it off as testing my reaction since it came after I promise to have effort today. Not like that gambit has never been seen before. <cite>DoomTheGyarados posted... </cite> <quote>You read what I wrote with Isquen and think to yourself he defended Isquen day 1, let me attack this but if you go back and read how I defended him precisely you would understand the tact I discussed with Crescent was one of prudence not me claiming to actually have any genuine concrete read.</quote> Issue being that you defended the idea of defending Isquen with the prudence line, but your defense of him directly brought up the personal read side too much for that to be entirely true. You covered for and appealed to him personally a bit too much for it to have been purely about disdain for day 1 newbie lynches (especially since it continued to a fair extent into today) <cite>DoomTheGyarados posted... </cite> <quote>For example, the Scare lynch was indeed town but you didnt offer any defense of him at the time.</quote> Wasn't here to do it. Like I know damn well you know better than to think this is meaningful, because while it's true that I could go silent on purpose as scum (I've never skipped a whole deadline as scum but I've peaced out at -15 minutes when town went full stupid) it's also true that I can just not be around and you have no way of knowing which is which to base an argument on. <cite>DoomTheGyarados posted... </cite> <quote> For one, there is nothing wrong with having people you were or are somewhat suspicious of voting with you to try to lynch people. You keep acting as if this is some weird thing but getting reactions out of people is pretty common Id say.</quote> It's not damning but it is a bit weird to be on board with voting alongside people you think are scum. You can have your opinion change based on how they respond to you sure but the way you went through it and explained it does not add up. Again, I'm not saying you totally derped the game with huge glaring errors, I know you don't make those much if ever. Only that there's too many smaller issues for me to not see through you. <cite>DoomTheGyarados posted... </cite> <quote> As for why I voted for you Marth moe or less asked, so I decided to. Sometimes I am just nice like that. Not everything has to be a huge conspiracy, sometimes I am very earnest.</quote> Not everything has to be but everything could be. --- Meow!</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1