LogFAQs > #964235533

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, Database 10 ( 02.17.2022-12-01-2022 ), DB11, DB12, Clear
Topic List
Page List: 1
TopicWould USA still rekt anyone in a war?
ssk9716757
04/12/22 5:57:07 PM
#34:


KamenRiderBlade posted...
The Taliban survived the 20 year occupation led by the US after Biden decided to pull the plug abruptly.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/War_in_Afghanistan_(2001%E2%80%932021)

There's a difference between "Beating the enemy" and "living long enough to outlast" the foreign powers political will to change your region into a Nation.

Anybody with half a brain in Washington DC knows that it was going to take longer than 20 years to turn Afghanistan into a unified Nation.

We're dealing with a Tribal region who have "NEVER / EVER" previously considered themselves a unified people.

UN listed Afghanistan amongst the Top-15 most corrupt countries in the world.

Nobody who has dealt with Afghanistan was going to think it was going to be "Quick or Easy" to unify the local people into a Nation State, especially with the Tribalistic mentality that prevails amongst those in Afghanistan.

You're trying to turn these Tribal enclaves into a Unified Nation State
https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/user_image/4/2/6/AAAFvAAACMfC.jpg
Something that has never been done before.

And the Taliban wants to rule all of Afghanistan with their power as a Terrorist Faction who uses violence to subjugate the locals under their (rule of law / regime)

they didnt beat america, america just surrendered

lol

---
I am the nucleus.
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1