LogFAQs > #964378533

scar the 1 posted...

It's weird to refer to Paludan as simply a "politician". He's a neonazi and a pedophile. Moreover, he's publically admitted that the subsequent riots was his goal all along. I don't think it'd be entirely wrong to call him a terrorist.

Fair enough. Still, the rioters played directly into his hands by getting offended to the degree that they set cars on fire over the proposed desecration of their "holy" book.

scar the 1 posted...

Ok but this is not Charlie Hebdo. These riots aren't committed by religious fundamentalists, but by angry and disenfranchised youths. It's not a phenomenon that's unique to any religion.

This isn't that far removed from the Charlie Hebdo killings. The rioters' actions clearly stem from being hypersensitive to criticism and mockery of Islam. And if your thesis were true, we should see angry, disenfranchised Christian youths (and yes, they do exist) rioting over comedians making fun of Christianity. Funny how that's not happening.