LogFAQs > #964678991

An evolutionary dead end?

Consider a few factors
-Human children are not capable of caring for themselves, and typically require some approximation of the "family unit" to flourish. When fathered by "alpha" males, children are denied this atmosphere and this leads to a lower socioeconomic status later in life
-Human evolution has traditionally involved min-maxing towards cooperative, communal behavior patterns. When we introduce an alternative driving force towards selfish and less socially adaptive traits, we introduce cracks and fissures into the gene pool.
-By incentivizing direct competition between human males rather than binary pairings dictated by affection or economic alliance, women unknowingly encourage violent conflict between potential mates which results in only the more "primal" males prospering through force of arms (ie white genocide).

This leads to a few potentially contradictory conclusions
-while the shift in women's attitudes has traditionally been analyzed through the lens of social decay (sin) the consequences are much more broadly reaching than that and could alter humanity on a broader scale
-the issue is potentially self correcting as we will eventually reach a point where copulation through feminism is no longer viable and more natural means of dividing this resource will emerge as a survival mechanism

Thoughts?