LogFAQs > #964810736

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, Database 10 ( 02.17.2022-12-01-2022 ), DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Amber Heard STOLE her testimony word for word FROM A MOVIE!
Cocytus 05/05/22 11:52:23 AM #43:	Tyranthraxus posted... No they actually can't. They'd have to introduce the script of the movie as evidence. Then they'd have to get a plagiarism expert witness to testify. Shit like this is exactly why judges say "no outside research" If we're going to start determining verdicts based off YouTube videos of idiots who already made up their mind as to who's guilty then the entire court system is broke. Edit: and look the dumbass deleted his video probably because people called him out for being a dumbass Never mind character assassination. Can't they use it to prove the witness has been rehearsed, shed doubt on her testimony? It doesn't have to be from social media. If it's a fact the attorney can still introduce it as evidence as long as the other side agrees. <cite>Cocytus posted [p:964810736] in Amber Hear... [t:80010206]...</cite> <quote>Tyranthraxus posted... </cite> <quote>No they actually can't. They'd have to introduce the script of the movie as evidence. Then they'd have to get a plagiarism expert witness to testify. Shit like this is exactly why judges say "no outside research" If we're going to start determining verdicts based off YouTube videos of idiots who already made up their mind as to who's guilty then the entire court system is broke. Edit: and look the dumbass deleted his video probably because people called him out for being a dumbass</quote>Never mind character assassination. Can't they use it to prove the witness has been rehearsed, shed doubt on her testimony? It doesn't have to be from social media. If it's a fact the attorney can still introduce it as evidence as long as the other side agrees. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1