LogFAQs > #965285234

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, Database 10 ( 02.17.2022-12-01-2022 ), DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Supreme Court Rolling Along With Their Trash Rulings
Revelation34 05/25/22 2:13:22 AM #15:	Gaawa_chan posted... You can read the logic of the ruling and the dissent in the link: https://www.scotusblog.com/2022/05/conservative-majority-hollows-out-precedent-on-ineffective-counsel-claims-in-federal-court/ You guys better hope you never get a shitty lawyer. SC is pissing our rights away. Do you have a list of their recent trash rulings? Count_Drachma posted... Wish SCOTUS would get off their fat asses and rule the death penalty unconstitutional, but they can't get their fat asses out of their seats and, even if they could, they'd likely break the chairs because they have some fat asses. Under what amendment would it be unconstitutional? --- Gamertag: Kegfarms, BF code: 2033480226, Treasure Cruise code 318,374,355, Steam: Kegfarms <cite>Revelation34 posted [p:965285234] in Supreme Co... [t:80032479]...</cite> <quote>Gaawa_chan posted...</cite> <quote> You can read the logic of the ruling and the dissent in the link: https://www.scotusblog.com/2022/05/conservative-majority-hollows-out-precedent-on-ineffective-counsel-claims-in-federal-court/ You guys better hope you never get a shitty lawyer. SC is pissing our rights away. </quote> Do you have a list of their recent trash rulings? Count_Drachma posted...</cite> <quote>Wish SCOTUS would get off their fat asses and rule the death penalty unconstitutional, but they can't get their fat asses out of their seats and, even if they could, they'd likely break the chairs because they have some fat asses. </quote> Under what amendment would it be unconstitutional? --- Gamertag: Kegfarms, BF code: 2033480226, Treasure Cruise code 318,374,355, Steam: Kegfarms</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1