LogFAQs > #965390655

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, Database 10 ( 02.17.2022-12-01-2022 ), DB11, DB12, Clear
Topic List
Page List: 1
TopicAttention: America
Lokarin
05/29/22 6:49:15 PM
#2:


A quote from a Steven Lehto vido:

> I apologize this is long but...

To assert rights in our adversarial system, you just have to assert them. They will challenge you, they will f with you to get you to back down; the same as police. The reason is if they can get you to relinquish rights at the roadside, the court (appellate court) will say you cannot now claim them in court. Because the court system you are in is not under common law, but are statutory courts under statutory law.

It is the same system from which ran early "pilgrim's" from the British legal system of the 1600's and political persecution. The Law Merchant. This system has been foisted upon our people since the 1913 Federal Reserve Act and its partner 1935 Social Security Act which together with the 14th Amendment creation of a New Type of citizenship, and finally the Act of 1871, was put into place after the US Bankruprcy in 1935, beginning in 1938

With the Tompkins vs Erie Railroad where the principal of standing made it imposible to sue absent a contract with the person against whom the claim was made. Tompkins was injured by a board sticking out of a rail car. Ultimately the Supreme Court ruled in essence, since Tomkins was nit engaged with Erie RR, he did not have standing to sue. So today, all kinds of evil can be done where injury is difficult to prove, like mass surveillance, and you have to prove it but you can't because "standing" kills your ability to obtain evidence through discovery.

---
"Salt cures Everything!"
My YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/user/Nirakolov/videos
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1