LogFAQs > #965426759

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, Database 10 ( 02.17.2022-12-01-2022 ), DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Argonaut's Casiolympics watch accuracy contest.
argonautweakend 05/31/22 9:42:34 AM #4:	I was going to update but I was tired and was busy yesterday. There is one clear winner here. One watch was actually +/- 0 seconds. DBC-611G -3 seconds(only watch to run slow) AQ-S810W +7s F-108WHC +2s CA-53W +2s DBC-32 +3s AE-1100W +/- 0 PRW-3500 +2s I suspect the one that was dead on probably gained and lost some time overall, but that placed it in the middle...there is no way it wouldn't have gained or lost throughout a week. Even today, 1.5 days later it reads dead on with time.gov.... It doesn't make sense! This one isn't even on a strap at the moment. Maybe that is the key? ALL HAIL AE-1100W https://www.runnerinn.com/f/13682/136828074/casio-ae-1100w.jpg <cite>argonautweakend posted [p:965426759] in Argonaut's... [t:80038140]...</cite> <quote>I was going to update but I was tired and was busy yesterday. There is one clear winner here. One watch was actually +/- 0 seconds. DBC-611G -3 seconds(only watch to run slow) AQ-S810W +7s F-108WHC +2s CA-53W +2s DBC-32 +3s AE-1100W +/- 0 PRW-3500 +2s I suspect the one that was dead on probably gained and lost some time overall, but that placed it in the middle...there is no way it wouldn't have gained or lost throughout a week. Even today, 1.5 days later it reads dead on with time.gov.... It doesn't make sense! This one isn't even on a strap at the moment. Maybe that is the key? ALL HAIL AE-1100W https://www.runnerinn.com/f/13682/136828074/casio-ae-1100w.jpg </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1