LogFAQs > #965654677

[LFAQs-redacted-quote]

Asking if it's moral to use the threat of violence to change laws places an inherent value on the law which does not exist. We should be asking if the threat of violence is moral if used to protect women's rights.

The law is just a process. It has no value if not encouraging moral behaviour. Otherwise it would be immoral for the supreme Court to change the law to begin with. You're using the phrase as a code to obfuscate what is actually occurring.