LogFAQs > #966146885

Sheep, what's your flavor?

In any case, I'm KABLAM!, also Town Vanilla.

Sheep007 posted...

Sure, I agree with most of this. None of it explains why you went for Red in the first place, imo.

Let me put it this way: I found it weird that it took Red restating stuff for you to come to this realisation. The information was almost all present beforehand. I don't even know if it's a scumtell or not, because I feel like Scum wouldn't jump on what Ben said so boldly, but something about your responses twinged my gut.

Really? You don't think it was weird at all that Ben claimed Red's role? Dude, let's not forget you got lynched last game because HB countered your Tracker claim. Why wouldn't my immediate response to duplicate roles be that someone is lying? And why wouldn't I immediately doubt Red over our Town paragon Ben?

Sheep, your response is starting to worry me. But let's set this straight. I feel like this should be obvious, but let's lay out the timeline here:

• Ben hinted at being able to lie detect
• I recognized this as a backup claim and mentioned that Ben should have a very good explanation for the N2 no kill
• Ben full claims backup but does not answer my question about N2
• I vote for Red. By this point in time, Red hasn't said anything
• Late into the night (12:45 AM in my time), Ben finally addresses my question and... says he has no idea what happened N2
• Red finally chimes in and repeats his explanation for N2
• I see the topic at around 2 AM my time and make my post unvoting Red, seeing how Ben did not have an explanation for N2 whereas Red still did

If Ben had a strong argument for the N2 no kill, I don't think I would've given Red as much room to breathe. But he didn't. So after Red gave his piece, I was willing to believe him again.

I suppose it wasn't so much that Red had a really good explanation and more that Ben lacked an explanation.