LogFAQs > #968363901

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, Database 10 ( 02.17.2022-12-01-2022 ), DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	did the soviets only defeat germany because of stalin's refusal to surrender?
Chunky 09/28/22 10:18:12 PM #1:	The germans were out-maneuvering them, even with far less men than the soviet union. But if you keep pouring men into the meat grinder, eventually you're going to overpower them, no matter how bad of a military it is. Had anyone else been in office, I think the soviets would have surrendered, but Stalin didn't give a shit. He just kept replacing them. They didn't win because of superior military, they won strictly because of quantity. Am I right on the mark on that one? --- The n00b of MBH and CE - and proud of it! President Chunkey Simmons, running for 2016. <cite>Chunky posted [p:968363901] in did the so... [t:80181544]...</cite> <quote>The germans were out-maneuvering them, even with far less men than the soviet union. But if you keep pouring men into the meat grinder, eventually you're going to overpower them, no matter how bad of a military it is.Had anyone else been in office, I think the soviets would have surrendered, but Stalin didn't give a shit. He just kept replacing them. They didn't win because of superior military, they won strictly because of quantity.Am I right on the mark on that one? --- The n00b of MBH and CE - and proud of it!President Chunkey Simmons, running for 2016.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1