LogFAQs > #968405907

Zergrush80 posted...

The random rule added a bit of a challenge to me, like seeing if you can win against a high level opponent while getting dealt geezard or bite bug cards. With the same and plus rule in effect too, it was very possible. Not saying I won all the time but was a fun thing to do.

Random wasn't bad because of difficulty, but that it made having a larger collection worse and could end up making it so you quite literally could not win. The AI in the game + their card quality was pretty low so most of the time you could pull out a win with bad cards, but if you played the game a lot (of which I did) there was a possibility to just end up in a mathematically impossible match. I had multiples of times where I quite literally only had single option moves that only ended up in my loss. This is somewhat why they made Tetra Master the way that they did, for the worse I might add, but the Random rule was a big problem. In addition I constantly played with sub-par options (like, I essentially refused to use any of the unique cards most of the time because they made things too easy) and Random meant I constantly had them showing up. In that line I remember Random far more for making things boringly easy than I do hard, when strictly talking about difficulty.

ziggawatts posted...

Most of the rules were fine. I only really disliked Direct, the one where the cards go to whoever was in control of them at the end. Made it more of a pain to get unique cards since you had to flip them instead of just winning, while also risking losing good cards.

Lol, just never use the character cards then. Can't lose good cards if you don't use them. :V