LogFAQs > #969169524

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, Database 11 ( 12.2022-11.2023 ), DB12, Clear
Topic List
Page List: 1
TopicWho's the last president that both sides could tolerate?
ellis123
11/03/22 4:02:14 PM
#37:


SolaFide posted...
This is pretty misleading because Washington was unanimously elected in both of his elections, and the Jeffersonian Republican hostility to his administration really didn't break out in huge numbers until the latter parts of his second term. Foreign policy issues, especially Washington's support for Britain against Revolutionary France, and his ascension to the Jay Treaty, made the Jeffersonians furious even though they were the right things to do given the context. Even Jefferson himself, who was a critic of Washington's administration, mostly blamed the things he didn't like about his Presidency on Alexander Hamilton and always spoke well of Washington as a man of republican conviction and as a leader.

Disparaging Washington for having political opponents is pretty silly when you consider that virtually every great statesman in history has had opponents to deal with as they have navigated complicated issues. Abraham Lincoln certainly had many bitter haters and enemies, and he really was not that popular either (he was a President elected with a plurality of the vote, not a majority), and yet that does not mean that those who think well of him are embracing "propaganda" or "deifying" the man. There is no question that Washington was the indispensable man of the Founding and one of the eminent statesmen in our history, whatever vitriol his Francophile enemies spouted about him.
I feel like you are missing my meaning. I am saying that Washington wasn't especially out there versus a lot of other presidents for roughly what you said. Washington gets overly glorified as people take his "he had no political rivals running against him" bit when it had just as much to do with the average person having actually heard of him as anything else (ignoring the fact that a non-trivial bit of that was that he was just flat out the richest person in the States at the time). The idea is that once you actually get to brass tacks acting like Washington was an outlier really wasn't that much and there are lots of other presidents that would qualify for "just as popular" if it weren't for things like the Internet/information being so much more readily available (as is travel).

---
"A shouted order to do something of dubious morality with an unpredictable outcome? Thweeet!"
My FC is in my profile.
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1