LogFAQs > #969520011

ParanoidObsessive posted...

My point is more that there's a very questionable line between suing people responsible for something and suing someone for doing a commercial for those people.

If Larry David is actually directly involved with FTX (as a member or policy maker) or was directly profiting from it as a pyramid scheme (ie, investing early, driving up value, then divesting), then sure, hold him legally responsible. But if all he did was literally cash a check and then show up to read some lines for an ad, it's a huge leap to say he should be held responsible in any way.

But you're comparing legitimate product from a well known company producing a well known line of product no reasonable person would find suspicious to some unknown ass holes making an illegitimate product in a line of products known almost exclusively for being scams.

You're making an absolutely absurd comparison and I'm actually interested in seeing how this pans out in court.