LogFAQs > #970305358

SwayM posted...

She could probably be anything you stand to conjecture. It doesnt mean anything or devalue what shes saying.

The very first line in that post shows Im not devaluing what she said in this specific video. You're just refusing to acknowledge the part where I claimed she was toxic by going straight for the obvious rebuttal. Im well aware that saying "she probably" also leaves room for "She maybe not" simultaneously. So, you're saying absolutely nothing. I deliberately talk in a way that leaves it open for debate. But you're anti-debating. You're just basically saying "No, because no".

So where we are at is,

I brought up her toxic ways to give insight on the woman getting the easy lay up and outed her for anyone interested.

And then you said nothing to defend against that and instead decided to give everyone insight on how "probably" is a word used before a loose theory and isn't the same thing as the word "definitely".

Now, do you want to comment on the Toxic claim and make me have to go get videos or what are we doing?