LogFAQs > #971211987

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, Database 11 ( 12.2022-11.2023 ), DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Turkey: yes on Finland, no on Sweden for NATO
Aressar 01/30/23 4:01:25 PM #7:	How did NATO even get to where it is today if allowing a new member requires a unanimous vote? And why would anyone think that such a requirement was a good idea anyway? A two-thirds majority, sure. But at this point it's becoming near-impossible to allow other countries to join, as one country or another will always find some reason to cockblock them. --- One time, CE triggered me so hard with their objectively wrong opinions that I accidentally punched myself in the balls. <cite>Aressar posted [p:971211987] in Turkey: ye... [t:80330053]...</cite> <quote>How did NATO even get to where it is today if allowing a new member requires a unanimous vote? And why would anyone think that such a requirement was a good idea anyway? A two-thirds majority, sure. But at this point it's becoming near-impossible to allow other countries to join, as one country or another will always find some reason to cockblock them. --- One time, CE triggered me so hard with their objectively wrong opinions that I accidentally punched myself in the balls.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1