LogFAQs > #972867239

Trumble posted...

The problem, ultimately, is those people. If guns weren't available, they would've used knives, or bats, or fists. Which would have meant - especially in the case of fists - likely far less severe injuries occurring. It's really more a question of "where do you draw the line" on which potential weapons have enough legitimate uses, rather than blaming any particular one - otherwise, the blame will always get placed on whatever one is closest to that line without crossing it.

this

I mean people hit people with cars. lets ban cars...
People have died from fist fights, lets cut off fists at birth...