I speak from the perspective of an educator. "You" is collective, representative of all stakeholders in that child's education, along with stakeholders in the success of a school.
Assessment, in whatever form it takes, is critical to educational goals, and comes in two varieties. Formative assessment is essentially asking the questions "What does this student know in this moment? What is their current progress towards the educational goals that were set? What evidence do I have of these things?" Formative assessment can be as simple as a participation grade, homework, exit tickets, or asking questions for the class to answer by raising their hands.
Summative assessment asks "To what degree has the student met the educational goals that were set now that we have reached the end of this block of learning?" Summative assessments include tests, quizzes, projects, essays, and presentations.
Now, tests are a perfectly valid assessment tool when correctly applied. From my perspective, there is a pushback against tests, especially high-stakes testing, because they are overrepresented in the kinds of assessments used by teachers and institutions, coupled with the misuse of their purpose and results. A good teacher uses a variety of both formative and summative assessments to measure student learning and, more importantly, to inform future planning and instruction.
No one said you can't give a test. A LOT of people are saying it shouldn't be a high stakes test and linked to school performance and graduation requirements. Give a test every day, Mr. Smith, just don't make all of us suffer from it.
---
Is this reverse psychology? And if I ask, will you lie to me?