LogFAQs > #973071495

I can't think of a reason anybody would logically get mad at AOC outside of her just not being on their "side." Anybody whose actions resulted in even indirect violence should be scrutinized. The law just isn't harsh enough because something like this could be difficult to prove beyond a shadow of a doubt. But just because it's not legally pursuable doesn't mean it's not morally wrong. But just because it's not pursuable legally, it's wrong to harass anybody I think, especially to the extent of like ruining their regular day life.

Actively pursuing Fucker Carlson would only propagate the hate. It's done under the mindset that he "needs to be taught a lesson," but I think instead just voicing your opinion publicly like this is like good enough. Not giving guys like him a platform is infinitely preferable to harassing him or even violently throwing him off, so she's actually 100% in the right here