LogFAQs > #973258274

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, Database 12 ( 11.2023-? ), Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Generative AI and the creative arts.
HaRRicH 05/04/23 10:45:05 AM #70:	UF8 posted... do people view commissioners as artists is the real question MZero posted... This is more like commissioning someone to make a logo and then claiming you made it Rereading the topic, I think I overlooked these posts...this is a fair argument. I've got commissioned art, and it is obvious to both me and the artist that I did not create art in commissioning it. Generative AI feels similar, minus me financially paying the right to ask for it or call it my own. One of the pieces is digital art and I bought full permission for whatever edits I want with it, but I never have enough to envision saying I now created that art -- I just edited it. I also have a painting that is just obviously not my own work when I asked for it. Still looking for the gray areas here though...how much must I paint over the painting before I can call it my own? Probably can't just paint my name at the bottom, probably can't just trace over it or paint by numbers over it. Can I reenvision the same image in a different way -- this realistic-looking oak tree now has a cartoon palm tree painted over it in the same canvas, for example? Can I even use that canvas at all for anything anymore? Similarly tying it back to writing with AI, can I change every line enough to follow plagiarism laws and call it my own? Can I change every single word but keep the same story and call it my own? Once the act of copying and pasting is done, is there ANYTHING that can done to it that allows you to be the creative author anymore? --- O P E R A T I O N O U S T : Nominate SHEIK! https://i.imgur.com/OpudFxm.jpg <cite>HaRRicH posted [p:973258274] in Generative... [t:80427419]...</cite> <quote>UF8 posted... </cite><quote>do people view commissioners as artists is the real question</quote>MZero posted... </cite><quote>This is more like commissioning someone to make a logo and then claiming you made it</quote>Rereading the topic, I think I overlooked these posts...this is a fair argument. I've got commissioned art, and it is obvious to both me and the artist that I did not create art in commissioning it. Generative AI feels similar, minus me financially paying the right to ask for it or call it my own. One of the pieces is digital art and I bought full permission for whatever edits I want with it, but I never have enough to envision saying I now created that art -- I just edited it. I also have a painting that is just obviously not my own work when I asked for it.Still looking for the gray areas here though...how much must I paint over the painting before I can call it my own? Probably can't just paint my name at the bottom, probably can't just trace over it or paint by numbers over it. Can I reenvision the same image in a different way -- this realistic-looking oak tree now has a cartoon palm tree painted over it in the same canvas, for example? Can I even use that canvas at all for anything anymore?Similarly tying it back to writing with AI, can I change every line enough to follow plagiarism laws and call it my own? Can I change every single word but keep the same story and call it my own? Once the act of copying and pasting is done, is there ANYTHING that can done to it that allows you to be the creative author anymore? --- O P E R A T I O N O U S T : Nominate SHEIK!https://i.imgur.com/OpudFxm.jpg</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1