LogFAQs > #973402245

SwollenColon posted...

Beer is also ignoring the fact that Sotomayor disclosed her earnings. It was public knowledge. Thomas hid his dealings. The two cases aren't even on the same planet ethics-wise

Also, Gorsuch had a book deal and didn't recuse, either. Wonder why Beer isn't crying about that one

Gorsuch had a book deal and sat on a case that directly involved the publishing company as a participant in said case? I didnt know this, and Id be interested in a source. And if true, thats definitely not good at all and should be investigated.

Its amazing that you guys keep trying to use half-baked whataboutisms and yet I remain consistent and objective each time. I sadly cant say the same for you.

In summary, it is BAD for any judge to oversee a case where they have a business relationship with one of the participating parties. Its awful. No matter who it is.