LogFAQs > #973710427

sveksii posted...

Irrelevant. The way the law's currently crafted it oversteps the boundaries of state rights and likely infringes on first amendment rights. The government's ability to dictate government contracts has nothing to do with this. As people use TikTok to express themselves, the issue of the government banning it is the argument that they are essentially controlling how people are able to express themselves.

The most likely end result of this law is Montanans having to pay more in taxes to foot the multi-million dollar lawsuit after the state fails to defend itself from lawsuits on its legality.

Irrelevant? So what if that Foreign Gov't use that Data to Spy and Gain insight on unsuspecting Americans? Would you be happy/fine with that?

Ozmose posted...

Now if only they'd add Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, Snapchat, and all the rest to the list we might make some progress in the right direction. I firmly believe a bulk of the social problems the modern world faces can be traced back to major social media platforms.

While I kinda agree but those companies are US based (I think) and subjected to heavy (relatively) oversight...some of them not even available in that other Country too (just like TikTok)