LogFAQs > #974605267

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, Database 12 ( 11.2023-? ), Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	So will Russia setting off a nuclear meltdown be enough to trigger WW3?
EthanSilver 07/03/23 7:03:34 PM #23:	shironinja posted... destabilize other countries and take all the economic benefit for your own. C Yeah, okay... but how does that address what going on a full "world war" would entail? "Destabilizing," is a long game game, not "TO WAR!" shironinja posted... China generally prefers to play the long game but they are interested in expanding in the face of climate change. Sure, what PooPoo bear would want is obvious. But one does not start a war on "wants" alone. Especially when you don't have the win in the bag. It easily end up being ending China. Don't see what PooPoo bear would take that gamble. <cite>EthanSilver posted [p:974605267] in So will Ru... [t:80498254]...</cite> <quote>shironinja posted... </cite><quote>destabilize other countries and take all the economic benefit for your own. C</quote>Yeah, okay... but how does that address what going on a full "world war" would entail?"Destabilizing," is a long game game, not "TO WAR!"shironinja posted... </cite><quote>China generally prefers to play the long game but they are interested in expanding in the face of climate change.</quote>Sure, what PooPoo bear would want is obvious. But one does not start a war on "wants" alone. Especially when you don't have the win in the bag. It easily end up being ending China. Don't see what PooPoo bear would take that gamble. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1