LogFAQs > #974755981

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, Database 12 ( 11.2023-? ), Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	twitter traffic tanking as threads passes 100 million users
Collat 07/10/23 9:37:58 PM #31:	lilORANG posted... The numbers are falsely inflated. Threads accounts are tied to Instagram accounts. Pretty sure that's not the case. It gave me the option to follow everyone I had on Instagram, but some definitely don't exist on threads yet. Antifar posted... The problem with Threads is that it's not good to use. Like, if I, as a baseball fan, wanted to see people posting about the home run derby right now, there's just no way to guarantee that. But I might see their posts pop up out of context sometime tomorrow. It seems like there are no search options other than to look up accounts, which is bizarre. I'm going to hold of on posting anything that isn't a direct reply since otherwise it's probably just going to be tossed out into the void with no way for people to discover it. <cite>Collat posted [p:974755981] in twitter tr... [t:80505002]...</cite> <quote>lilORANG posted... </cite><quote>The numbers are falsely inflated. Threads accounts are tied to Instagram accounts.</quote>Pretty sure that's not the case. It gave me the option to follow everyone I had on Instagram, but some definitely don't exist on threads yet.Antifar posted... </cite><quote>The problem with Threads is that it's not good to use. Like, if I, as a baseball fan, wanted to see people posting about the home run derby right now, there's just no way to guarantee that. But I might see their posts pop up out of context sometime tomorrow.</quote>It seems like there are no search options other than to look up accounts, which is bizarre. I'm going to hold of on posting anything that isn't a direct reply since otherwise it's probably just going to be tossed out into the void with no way for people to discover it.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1