LogFAQs > #974899301

AltOmega2 posted...

I get what you're saying but 14 years old ain't pedo either. We need to normalize either "hebephilia" or "ephebeophilia" to show that there's a difference and that it matters.

Wait, how is it not scientifically true? There's a biological difference. It's gross, I agree, but pretending it doesn't exist isn't the answer.

I will suggest that the difference does not matter. Or if you want to use them for further classification, sure, but you're still under the umbrella of 'minor-attracted'. I think there should be more resources for these people, but nit-picking the classification of an adult fucking a teen isn't exactly my bag. It'd be like nitpicking someone arrested for bestiality because they only boned monkeys.

If you think a 14 or 17 year old is more 'biologically viable' than someone of adult age, that's fucking dumb, gross and wrong. Just because it was how humans biologically operated in ancient times does not mean that's how we biologically operate now. A woman's birthing canal is generally NOT suited for childbirth at the ages you're suggesting. Unless you're also a fan of infant mortality and girls dying in childbirth.