LogFAQs > #975414924

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, Database 12 ( 11.2023-? ), Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Why does Baldur get a pass for being horny, but JP games don't?
ArtiRock 08/12/23 5:39:47 PM #466:	asdf8562 posted... My reading comprehension is just fine. You made this topic to bitch and whine about some supposed double standard of you being upset people want less lolis, and characters that are drawn to look, sound and or act like children, sexualized..... and your rationale is it should be okay because furries exist (something I dont support either btw) because and I quote, ...... "Reminder that age of consent doesnt actually apply to fictional characters anyway." Those were your words. It's quite amazing you thought posting either of those things justifies your point. In fact, if this was only about you not wanting to see furries, you could have simply made a topic about furries and kept it strictly about that. You deciding to "remind" everyone that and I quote, "age of consent doesnt actually apply to fictional characters anyway" as some kind of counter point to sexualized underage looking and sounding characters. Which tells everyone you want lolis, and characters that are drawn to look, sound and or act like children, sexualized..... to get a, and I quote, "pass for being horny" too. The topic started off as a loud dog whistle to what your intentions were, and ended with a loud ass siren with your mask coming completely off. Right, and I saw through it immediately, hence my first post. It's especially stupid, because I can think of adult Japanese games that don't have you dealing with childlike characters. And there are examples of where you can have cute characters obviously having sex of sorts and it's fine. Think something like story of seasons. In Friends of Mineral Town especially, you have characters looking like this (both of them are romanceable BTW): https://i.pcmag.com/imagery/reviews/02NQQvuK28FeHT5WOqEnMRh-1..v1595248410.jpg I don't have a problem with people going with looks etc for who they want to bang because even if they are cute, they are adults first. Hell, YOU are just as cute and you know that you are an adult. No one complains about it, because the art style makes everyone cute. Sure, I prefer the older art style, I think that's because I grew up with the Back to Nature / 64 versions so there's a bit of nostalgia bias there. --- This is the duty of the Grim Angels. <cite>ArtiRock posted [p:975414924] in Why does B... [t:80533965]...</cite> <quote>asdf8562 posted... </cite><quote>My reading comprehension is just fine. You made this topic to bitch and whine about some supposed double standard of you being upset people want less lolis, and characters that are drawn to look, sound and or act like children, sexualized..... and your rationale is it should be okay because furries exist (something I dont support either btw) because and I quote, ...... "Reminder that age of consent doesnt actually apply to fictional characters anyway." Those were your words. It's quite amazing you thought posting either of those things justifies your point. In fact, if this was only about you not wanting to see furries, you could have simply made a topic about furries and kept it strictly about that. You deciding to "remind" everyone that and I quote, "age of consent doesnt actually apply to fictional characters anyway" as some kind of counter point to sexualized underage looking and sounding characters. Which tells everyone you want lolis, and characters that are drawn to look, sound and or act like children, sexualized..... to get a, and I quote, "pass for being horny" too.The topic started off as a loud dog whistle to what your intentions were, and ended with a loud ass siren with your mask coming completely off.</quote>Right, and I saw through it immediately, hence my first post. It's especially stupid, because I can think of adult Japanese games that don't have you dealing with childlike characters. And there are examples of where you can have cute characters obviously having sex of sorts and it's fine. Think something like story of seasons. In Friends of Mineral Town especially, you have characters looking like this (both of them are romanceable BTW): https://i.pcmag.com/imagery/reviews/02NQQvuK28FeHT5WOqEnMRh-1..v1595248410.jpgI don't have a problem with people going with looks etc for who they want to bang because even if they are cute, they are adults first. Hell, YOU are just as cute and you know that you are an adult. No one complains about it, because the art style makes everyone cute. Sure, I prefer the older art style, I think that's because I grew up with the Back to Nature / 64 versions so there's a bit of nostalgia bias there. --- This is the duty of the Grim Angels.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1