LogFAQs > #975440046

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, Database 12 ( 11.2023-? ), Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	theres literally no reason fast food places should ever raise their prices
InfinityMonster 08/14/23 4:13:08 AM #41:	Torgo posted... How did you arrive at that conclusion and those statistics? What do you mean a "cut is given"... they take all the profits. They don't make hundreds of millions or billions by reinvesting into communities. They pay employees as little as they can get away with as business owners. That's how capitalism works: these are not negotiations between two equal parties. Corporate does not "take all profits". Not sure where you got that. Depending on the franchise, they have to pay out 5-15% of the revenue for being able to use the franchise name. Corporate also doesn't pay the franchise employees, so again, not sure where you're getting all this. Almost like you're just making it up. Torgo posted... Are you making a case for franchise owners? Most franchise owners now are multiple location owners that don't do any of the actual operation or live in the community. They call them multi-unit franchise owners, and that number is rapidly growing. So even these are no longer the mom-and-pop with a dream owners of past generations. Can you provide data on how many of the 300k of them are owned by single franchises? --- "It lies between the pit of man's fears and the summit of his knowledge" <cite>InfinityMonster posted [p:975440046] in theres lit... [t:80536195]...</cite> <quote>Torgo posted... </cite><quote>How did you arrive at that conclusion and those statistics?What do you mean a "cut is given"... they take all the profits. They don't make hundreds of millions or billions by reinvesting into communities. They pay employees as little as they can get away with as business owners. That's how capitalism works: these are not negotiations between two equal parties.</quote>Corporate does not "take all profits". Not sure where you got that. Depending on the franchise, they have to pay out 5-15% of the revenue for being able to use the franchise name.Corporate also doesn't pay the franchise employees, so again, not sure where you're getting all this. Almost like you're just making it up.Torgo posted... </cite><quote>Are you making a case for franchise owners? Most franchise owners now are multiple location owners that don't do any of the actual operation or live in the community. They call them multi-unit franchise owners, and that number is rapidly growing. So even these are no longer the mom-and-pop with a dream owners of past generations.</quote>Can you provide data on how many of the 300k of them are owned by single franchises? --- "It lies between the pit of man's fears and the summit of his knowledge"</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1