LogFAQs > #976595853

Glob posted...

No, thats not actually what my logic dictates at all.

Im not even arguing about which one is easier. Im just saying that the bar is low enough for meeting people in real life that it doesnt make sense that any other method would be as much more effective as the post I initially challenged claimed. Way way way way way? No. Thats nonsense.

The reason I brought up frustrated incels is because if your method was so ridiculously easy, which you claim it to be by placing it that much over meeting people in real life, they would barely exist. And yet they do, in droves.

The reality of the situation is probably just that each method has its advantages and disadvantages.

That's absolute nonsense. It IS "way way way way way" easier.
I've had 2 4 year relationships, 1 6 year relationship, and a few other shorter relationships. I've had sex with over 40 or so women at this point.

Not a single person I dated or had sex with did I initially meet offline. Even the one that went to my own High School added me on Myspace before we started talking.

Online dating allows you to set up a profile where you can see a person's hobbies and interests before actually talking to them. You can rarely, if ever, assume a person's hobbies and interests offline unless you're actively meeting at an incredibly niche group or have a very niche job. And meeting people at work always runs the risk of being rejected and having the awkwardness of having to see them daily or having them report you or something.
Unless you drink -- which even then, the question of consent is a big one there, then meeting people offline naturally is NOT easier or even close to being as easy.