LogFAQs > #976790117

hockeybub89 posted...

Even when you have no evidence of anything, you make giant posts about how you feel studies would probably agree with you. No one believes that you challenge yourself or are open to change.

I am sharing my perspective. You are welcome to share your perspective. However I do not appreciate being called "the worst". It is telling that IRL I am never met with the kind of animosity that a few people show here, it goes against many of your assertions about my character. I have developed a good relationship with my project lead at work, and I expressed that I fear that people secretly hated me there, and she insisted quite adamantly that nobody at work hated me, that I am very kind and compassionate, and that I needed to stop being so hard on myself.

Nearly everybody I know IRL says, quite emphatically I am far too hard on myself.

It is only when I go to a forum with a limited ideology window and express myself honestly in a way that seems to deviate from their consensus that am I treated like a contemptable pariah and my character is attacked. I think it stands to reason that my honest non-conformity rather than my character which is to blame for that response.

I try to sincerely share my perspective and opinion. I do so respectfully. You are and always were welcome to challenge that perspective. But IMO resorting to mockery and character attacks when you have no substantive challenges to my argument/perspective is at best childish and at worst needlessly cruel. I remember you HB, you are capable of civility and good faith discussions, I hope you return to that.