DarkBuster22904 posted... Which doesn't answer the question.
Ignoring the fact that The Good Place just completely dismisses utilitarian ethics for com0letely arbitrary reasons, there is no evidence that Mr Beast's humanitarian work is coming from a place of egocentrism.
He's a content creator, not an oil tycoon. The money that makes these humanitarian stunts possible is driven by the content he creates. It's not some insidious ego trip to feature these stunts in videos in an effort to help fund the next one.
Yeah, I'm not sure what the point of bringing that up was.
The Good Place stating
actually no one in the modern era is good because doing something as innocuous as buying flowers is a net negative since those flowers could have been harvested through exploited labor, harmful pesticides, and other factors that are beyond the person's control.
Is that somehow comparable to MrBeast?