LogFAQs > #977868603

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, Database 12 ( 11.2023-? ), Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	MLB Off-season Topic
Touch 12/22/23 1:00:04 AM #168:	CrimsonGear80 posted... on on hand: fucking dodgers. I get it, there are no rules against signing every major FA with any amount of money...but there has to be some rules laid out in the future against shit like this.....which there won't be, If MLB could have the dodgers and the yankees in the WS every year they would... on the other hand: it doesn't matter, they will still be beat in the first round by an 80-win team every year What's stupid is that there were reports that if the Aaron Judge to the Padres deal went through, the league would've vetoed it. But Dodgers get to pull this shit and it's just lolpovertyfranchisesjusrgetricher --- My expectations they are low But you're the sun you make them grow <cite>Touch posted [p:977868603] in MLB Off-se... [t:80609222]...</cite> <quote>CrimsonGear80 posted... </cite><quote>on on hand: fucking dodgers. I get it, there are no rules against signing every major FA with any amount of money...but there has to be some rules laid out in the future against shit like this.....which there won't be, If MLB could have the dodgers and the yankees in the WS every year they would...on the other hand: it doesn't matter, they will still be beat in the first round by an 80-win team every year</quote>What's stupid is that there were reports that if the Aaron Judge to the Padres deal went through, the league would've vetoed it. But Dodgers get to pull this shit and it's just lolpovertyfranchisesjusrgetricher --- My expectations they are lowBut you're the sun you make them grow</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1