LogFAQs > #977871038

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, Database 12 ( 11.2023-? ), Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	MLB Off-season Topic
hop918 12/22/23 7:35:03 AM #178:	Touch posted... What's stupid is that there were reports that if the Aaron Judge to the Padres deal went through, the league would've vetoed it. But Dodgers get to pull this shit and it's just lolpovertyfranchisesjusrgetricher That's only because the way the deal was reportedly setup so the Padres were working around the competitive balance tax, it had nothing to do with who was on the team. The supposed deal was for $400 million with the average annual value around $28 million, which would have been outside the top 20. While that's not necessarily wrong in doing the league thought the Padres only set it up that way to avoid the luxury tax. https://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2022/12/latest-on-padres-pursuit-of-aaron-judge.html <cite>hop918 posted [p:977871038] in MLB Off-se... [t:80609222]...</cite> <quote>Touch posted... </cite><quote>What's stupid is that there were reports that if the Aaron Judge to the Padres deal went through, the league would've vetoed it. But Dodgers get to pull this shit and it's just lolpovertyfranchisesjusrgetricher</quote>That's only because the way the deal was reportedly setup so the Padres were working around the competitive balance tax, it had nothing to do with who was on the team. The supposed deal was for $400 million with the average annual value around $28 million, which would have been outside the top 20. While that's not necessarily wrong in doing the league thought the Padres only set it up that way to avoid the luxury tax.https://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2022/12/latest-on-padres-pursuit-of-aaron-judge.html</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1