LogFAQs > #886749652

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, Database 2 ( 09.16.2017-02.21.2018 ), DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear
Topic List
Page List: 1
TopicPolitics Containment Topic 133: Easy D's Democratic Dalliance
Eddv
09/17/17 3:06:00 AM
#159:


MoogleKupo141 posted...
wait

are there even laws enforcing bathroom divides? I thought North Carolina had to specifically introduce a bill to keep trans people out of the other bathroom. That would suggest it was legal for trans people to use the bathroom they wanted to use before that bill.

Corrik should be pro-trans people in whatever bathroom in that case.


Its an unwritten rule - though a male barging into a women's restroom might be charged with sexual harassment under the right circumstances (i e hes being a peeping tom or something)

North Carolina found itself in this position because the City of Charlotte passed an ordinance affirming that transgender people could not be discriminated against, arrested, or harassed for using the bathroom of their choice in public buildings.

The state then said that it was now state law that whatever your BIOLOGICAL sex was determined whuch restroom you could use. It also barred any city in the state from passing an ordinance that would effect local employment laws to blanket ban any sort of workaround measure.
---
Board 8's Voice of Reason
http://i.imgur.com/chXIw06.jpg
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1