LogFAQs > #886815916

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, Database 2 ( 09.16.2017-02.21.2018 ), DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Everyone's freaking out about Mario's nips but there's something we all forgot
Spidey5 09/18/17 9:00:54 AM #66:	TrevorBlack79 posted... D-Lo_BrownTown posted... You know, kind of like up until like Wind Waker, every new iteration of Zelda was just kind of supposed to be a new legend until fans went bats* crazy trying to link it all together? So they literally had to make a timeline that made the first bunch of games not even line up with the others to appease them? Zelda always had a timeline. AoL was advertised as a sequel to LoZ, while LttP was advertised as a prequel to both of them. That's why it's titled Link to the Past. LA took place directly after LttP, then OoT was advertised as the first entry in the story, with MM being a direct sequel to OoT. All long before WW was even a concept. WW is where they started to get wonky with the split timeline stuff, but there was always a timeline before WW. Yeah, I don't get why, but something about the timeline always seems to make people mad and say things like "it was just BSed to appease fans, or it was made cause whiny fans, or blah blah blah fans!!!!!!" When Aonuma literally said they've always been keeping track of it and just never released it. At least until a few years ago. Lol at saying WW forced them to make a timeline. ~~also, everytime I explain that Aonuma said they always kept track, I've never gotten more than a "nuh uh, it was forced" rebuttal.~~ --- http://i.imgur.com/DkTqC9U.gif http://i.imgur.com/ps91Wdn.gif http://i.imgur.com/uoWvclC.gif http://i.imgur.com/5hMktiD.gif <cite>Spidey5 posted [p:886815916] in Everyone's... [t:75779494]...</cite> <quote><cite>TrevorBlack79 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>D-Lo_BrownTown posted...</cite> <quote>You know, kind of like up until like Wind Waker, every new iteration of Zelda was just kind of supposed to be a new legend until fans went bats* crazy trying to link it all together? So they literally had to make a timeline that made the first bunch of games not even line up with the others to appease them?</quote> Zelda always had a timeline. AoL was advertised as a sequel to LoZ, while LttP was advertised as a prequel to both of them. That's why it's titled Link to the Past. LA took place directly after LttP, then OoT was advertised as the first entry in the story, with MM being a direct sequel to OoT. All long before WW was even a concept. WW is where they started to get wonky with the split timeline stuff, but there was always a timeline before WW.</quote> Yeah, I don't get why, but something about the timeline always seems to make people mad and say things like "it was just BSed to appease fans, or it was made cause whiny fans, or blah blah blah fans!!!!!!" When Aonuma literally said they've always been keeping track of it and just never released it. At least until a few years ago. Lol at saying WW forced them to make a timeline. also, everytime I explain that Aonuma said they always kept track, I've never gotten more than a "nuh uh, it was forced" rebuttal. --- http://i.imgur.com/DkTqC9U.gif http://i.imgur.com/ps91Wdn.gif http://i.imgur.com/uoWvclC.gif http://i.imgur.com/5hMktiD.gif</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1