LogFAQs > #887392362

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, Database 2 ( 09.16.2017-02.21.2018 ), DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Is there any form of marriage you oppose?
adjl 09/27/17 1:49:37 PM #30:	Unbridled9 posted... adjl posted... Unbridled9 posted... I find it funny that, ignoring the multiple option, people are less opposed to marrying their twin sisters in a polygamous marriage than they are marrying someone who is 17. Of course with the 'multiple' option I'm sure that number is different. As I said, consent is the only important thing. Confirming consent can get hazy in cases of incest, because grooming is a thing, but provided all involved parties are consenting adults, they can do whatever they want. But then, say, couldn't a woman consent to having sex with her dog and the dog 'consent' by engaging in the act? No, because animals can't consent. It gets a little shaky when it's women engaging in bestiality, since the animal's doing most of the work and therefore clearly wants to be doing it, but there's a similar issue as appears with minors in that you can't claim that the dog understands anything beyond "me horny, me hump," and having sex with them is therefore exploitative. Whatever the animal's instincts and subsequent desires might be, there's definitely a major power imbalance between an animal and a human in a sexual relationship, and power imbalances in sexual relationships are no bueno. Ergo, bestiality's bad. --- This is my signature. It exists to keep people from skipping the last line of my posts. <cite>adjl posted [p:887392362] in Is there a... [t:75816433]...</cite> <quote><cite>Unbridled9 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>adjl posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Unbridled9 posted...</cite> <quote>I find it funny that, ignoring the multiple option, people are less opposed to marrying their twin sisters in a polygamous marriage than they are marrying someone who is 17. Of course with the 'multiple' option I'm sure that number is different.</quote> As I said, consent is the only important thing. Confirming consent can get hazy in cases of incest, because grooming is a thing, but provided all involved parties are consenting adults, they can do whatever they want.</quote> But then, say, couldn't a woman consent to having sex with her dog and the dog 'consent' by engaging in the act?</quote> No, because animals can't consent. It gets a little shaky when it's women engaging in bestiality, since the animal's doing most of the work and therefore clearly wants to be doing it, but there's a similar issue as appears with minors in that you can't claim that the dog understands anything beyond "me horny, me hump," and having sex with them is therefore exploitative. Whatever the animal's instincts and subsequent desires might be, there's definitely a major power imbalance between an animal and a human in a sexual relationship, and power imbalances in sexual relationships are no bueno. Ergo, bestiality's bad. --- This is my signature. It exists to keep people from skipping the last line of my posts.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1