LogFAQs > #887400105

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, Database 2 ( 09.16.2017-02.21.2018 ), DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear
Topic List
Page List: 1
TopicIs there any form of marriage you oppose?
adjl
09/27/17 4:07:22 PM
#38:


dioxxys posted...
I still find it hilarious that adjl wants animals to give consent on sex but yet they are incapable of consenting to being fixed, turned into mincemeat, forced into captivity, enslaved, etc.

Its like peoples reasons for disapproving of bestiality are illegitimate, considering all the other things we do to animals without their consent. Just face it, animals dont have rights.


I mostly see it as setting a standard for human behaviour, rather than a standard for how animals are treated. Humans should be expected to secure consent before engaging in sexual activity. If they can't (as is the case with non-sentient beings), don't sex them. Animal rights are another matter entirely.

Though, that said, I'd say those other things you mentioned are more justifiable than having sex with animals is. They at least serve some sort of practical purpose. Slaughtering an animal may be unsavory, but sustenance is a much more legitimate justification than having a pre-warmed fleshlight.

dioxxys posted...
Veedrock- posted...
adjl posted...
power imbalances in sexual relationships are no bueno

I disagree.

Same.

Its just some peoples fetish to be dominated jeez


Non-consensual power imbalances, then. Sub/dom play is certainly a thing, but that submission is consensual because the dom has been invited to fill that role. Imbalances created by willingly giving up power are fine, but not imbalances where one party inherently has more power than the other (this is the same problem with teacher-student or boss-employee relationships).
---
This is my signature. It exists to keep people from skipping the last line of my posts.
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1