LogFAQs > #887401508

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, Database 2 ( 09.16.2017-02.21.2018 ), DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear
Topic List
Page List: 1
TopicIs there any form of marriage you oppose?
Currant_Kaiser
09/27/17 4:32:28 PM
#39:


adjl posted...
I mostly see it as setting a standard for human behaviour, rather than a standard for how animals are treated.


By that logic we're setting a standard that allows us to kill humans for their meat.

adjl posted...
Though, that said, I'd say those other things you mentioned are more justifiable than having sex with animals is. They at least serve some sort of practical purpose. Slaughtering an animal may be unsavory, but sustenance is a much more legitimate justification than having a pre-warmed fleshlight.


The problem with this is that you're only measuring justifiability by how exactly it benefits humans, completely ignoring the well-being of an animal. From the animal's perspective, I'm sure it'd much rather get fucked, with or without consent, than get slaughtered. Fucking an animal and leaving it alive would seem to me to be more justifiable than killing it.
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1