LogFAQs > #887815919

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, Database 2 ( 09.16.2017-02.21.2018 ), DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear
Topic List
Page List: 1
TopicNew Manafort e-mails offer stronger evidence of a quid pro quo with a Russian...
Doctor Foxx
10/04/17 5:52:47 PM
#31:


argonautweakend posted...
None of those things are constitutional rights though, really. So having an ID for those things you dont have to do(and things such as tobacco you arent being carded for if you look way over 18) doesnt matter.

Poll taxes are illegal, so requiring an ID to vote(which costs money), could be construed as a poll tax, regardless of all the things you can do, but arent required to do with one.

I dont even think ID laws are racist at all. They do disenfranchise poor people the most(of all races and backgrounds), and those people vote in larger number...democrat.

This is correct and these policies have been struck down by courts for being unconstitutional.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voting_Rights_Act_of_1965

http://www.history.com/topics/black-history/voting-rights-act

2016 was the first election after the Voting Rights Act was gutted in 2013. 17 states had new voting restriction policies implemented before the election, including key swing states like Wisconsin.
---
Never write off the Doctor!
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1