What if a serial killer won the lottery and bought an apache helicopter on the black market and went on a killing rampage through new york?
I feel like hypotheticals like this lack a point.
I assume the point is that the TC wanted to emphasize that within our legal system/structure women have an inherent advantage and functionally have the power to ruin a man's life without much real effort and no repercussion.
What about how rape is incredibly hard to get a conviction for and even if there is the inevitable result is the woman is made a social pariah for "ruining the guy's life", which is why most women don't come forward or see through an attempted conviction? Because that's the actual reality of this situation, not the "what if" unlikely hypothetical scenario.
You can make an argument that there's an inherent advantage for rapists in the current legal system, not that I have an answer for how to improve that. At least culturally we need to change.
What country do you live in where a woman reporting having been raped makes her a social pariah? I live in a country where the "common consensus" is that one in four women will be raped in college. Clearly my country isn't one where the act of being raped and reporting it ruins your social standing.
There's no way 1 in 4 women are raped in college.
If a man and a woman are both equally under the influence of alcohol and have consensual sex (I'm not talking pass out drunk either) the man raped that woman. ---
