Can someone point out please where the article "misleads" people into thinking it was a public restroom, or where anyone other than people saying "it was a private restroom" said anything about it being public.
When people talk about Liberals and saying why Liberals say that stuff doesn't happen, it is clear what the implications are. If this person wasn't Trans, seemingly nothing would have changed about the situation since it was in family bathroom.
They wouldnt have even mentioned bathroom in the title of the article if it wasnt a trans person.
Disagree. 3rd grade taught me the 5 W's Who, What, Where, When, Why
Where- A bathroom
You can say you disagree but we all know the only reason this story keeps getting shared is because its about a trans person and a bathroom. Like the location clearly isnt a big part of what actually happened and yet its in every single headline regarding this case.
No you're absolutely right. Let's totally ignore the fact that a young child was raped and molested.
That's quite a jump. The location of the house not being important doesn't mean we are ignoring the rest of the story. ---
