LogFAQs > #889523722

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, Database 2 ( 09.16.2017-02.21.2018 ), DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	This 22 y/o Girl is DEAD after a Suicidal BOY landed on her Car..and he LIVED!!!
Zeus 10/31/17 8:33:48 PM #36:	streamofthesky posted... Zeus posted... streamofthesky posted... More people think a mentally ill 12 year old boy who clearly didn't intend to land on a car by random chance as he jumped off should be punished than think a bunch of 15-17 year olds intentionally throwing huge rocks at drivers' windshields "for teh evulz" should be charged with murder after...shocker!....it lead to someone getting killed. WTF, PotD! Few things: 1) You haven't addressed your initial deception. Walking it back to "the vast majority" doesn't excuse your claim that more people thought the kid should be charged than the teens, which was an outright lie. (Not to mention that at least one of the votes for "yes" was a poster who admitted he voted before realizing that the boy who landed on her car was 12, which is very likely the situation for other votes as well.) Here, I bolded key parts of my initial post since you've repeatedly proven you're incapable of reading it, hopefully that helps you. I never compared charge the teens vs. charge the kid. I compared charge the teens WITH MURDER vs. charge the kid (with any crime). Because murder requires intent, manslaughter does not. Throwing stones off an overpass and getting into a car drunk can both result in somebody being killed, but neither one strictly has the intent of killing somebody. And everybody wanted to charge them with something and punish them with something, the only argument was over legal precedent. --- (\/)(\/)\|-\| In Zeus We Trust: All Others Pay Cash <cite>Zeus posted [p:889523722] in This 22 y/... [t:75934756]...</cite> <quote><cite>streamofthesky posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Zeus posted...</cite> <quote><cite>streamofthesky posted...</cite> <quote>More people think a mentally ill 12 year old boy who clearly didn't intend to land on a car by random chance as he jumped off should be punished than think a bunch of 15-17 year olds intentionally throwing huge rocks at drivers' windshields "for teh evulz" should be charged with murder after...shocker!....it lead to someone getting killed. WTF, PotD!</quote> Few things: 1) You haven't addressed your initial deception. Walking it back to "the vast majority" doesn't excuse your claim that more people thought the kid should be charged than the teens, which was an outright lie. (Not to mention that at least one of the votes for "yes" was a poster who admitted he voted before realizing that the boy who landed on her car was 12, which is very likely the situation for other votes as well.) </quote> Here, I bolded key parts of my initial post since you've repeatedly proven you're incapable of reading it, hopefully that helps you. I never compared charge the teens vs. charge the kid. I compared charge the teens WITH MURDER vs. charge the kid (with any crime).</quote> Because murder requires intent, manslaughter does not. Throwing stones off an overpass and getting into a car drunk can both result in somebody being killed, but neither one strictly has the intent of killing somebody. And everybody wanted to charge them with something and punish them with something, the only argument was over legal precedent. --- (\/)(\/)\|-\| In Zeus We Trust: All Others Pay Cash</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1